oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list
From: Kash Pande <kash () tripleback net>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:07:00 -0400
On 02/04/15 10:47 AM, Sona Sarmadi wrote:
Is there any reason for this separation? Is this something the upstream projects desire? We all want the same thing, we all care about security, that is why people want to be on this list. Is this an attempt to punish companies and their open source users just because these companies also have closed source products? What is unfree with Enea Linux?
It sure looks like this is punishment for companies who use OSS!
I think it is good that more people show interest in security and want to be on the list. If being on this list helps security updates to spread more quickly, why not let these people/distros in as long as they are serious, reliable and follow the rules and processes. Regards //Sona
Current thread:
- RE: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Sona Sarmadi (Apr 02)
- Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Kash Pande (Apr 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Seth Arnold (Apr 02)
- Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Daniel Micay (Apr 02)
- RE: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Sona Sarmadi (Apr 03)
- Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Seth Arnold (Apr 03)
- Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Seth Arnold (Apr 03)
- Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list Daniel Micay (Apr 02)