oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390)
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 19:22:52 +0200
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:17:54PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote:If you're an [...] you can now apply to joinThis is generally how clubs work.
Sure. What's your point? Like I said, what we're supporting with (linux-)distros is a certain kind of "selective disclosure". Alexander
Current thread:
- Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Matthew Garrett (Aug 08)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Stiepan (Aug 09)
- RE: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Reinis Rozitis (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Solar Designer (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Stiepan (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) David T. (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Solar Designer (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Kurt H Maier (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Solar Designer (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Stiepan (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Stiepan (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux TCP implementation vulnerable to Denial of Service (CVE 2018-5390) Matthew Garrett (Aug 09)