PaulDotCom mailing list archives

e-mail attachments and security


From: crvallance at gmail.com (Colin Vallance)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:34:24 -0600

I've used 7zip and the 256 AES encryption in the past with customers that
aren't willing to be reasonable.  The down side is that windows itself
doesn't recognize the encryption type so you need 7zip or winzip to open
them.  You could also use the ZipCrypto encryption which windows will
recognize but I'm fairly certain it doesn't really gain you any real
protection.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Bert Van Kets <mailing at vankets.com> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I got a pretty interesting question from my brother yesterday. He's a
medical doctor in the UK and he needs to send reports to other doctors
by e-mail regularly. The reports are in MS Word format. These doctors
are in different locations and not connected to a common organization
(hospital or company).
At the moment he uses the MSWord password protection to try to keep the
sensitive data away from prying eyes. We all know how secure that method
is (not!).
I told hem he'd better use some other system that guarantees a bit more
protection but the problem is he can not ask of the people who receive
the reports to install extra software (like PGP or GPG encryption). The
security may not get in the way of the usability. Asking the receivers
to install extra software and configuring it is not an option. These are
not IT guys and don't even know how to spell GPG, let alone install it.
Passing a password over by telephone is the maximum these guys are
willing to go. 8-O

Do you guys have some ideas on what could be a better solution for this
"three legged stool" problem?

Thanks.

Bert
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100126/276f662f/attachment.htm 


Current thread: