Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] Implications for "Looking around?" [FBI confiscation of allegely curious student]
From: David Ford <david () LINUX COM>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 10:32:23 -0800
Bill Pennington wrote:
One thing that keeps entering my mind is the confiscation of his CD's that contained MP3s and porn. The FBI stated that they needed to check it for
They did not confiscate his CDs.
On another note when did web site defacements become a federal crime worth this much investigation? I was told by an FBI officer that the FBI will not get involved until the monetary lose goes above 10k. I can't see how a web site defacement can cost that much. Smells like a publicity grab to me.
Depends on which agent you speak with it seems. Some react more quickly than 10K, some are still sleeping 100K later. Web site defacement can arguably be very expensive. Don't continue on this line, this is up to the lawyers and litigation.
Note: I did not see the defacement I only assume that it is like the 900 other defacements that get posted everyday to attrition.org. A simple file copy and you are back in business. It seems like the FBI could be very busy if it monitored attrition.org and went after every web site that gets defaced in the US.
..If every site called up the feds, they would be very busy. It's no less a crime because it isn't reported. It's a crime yes or no, the damages vary.
I feel for the FBI guys I really do. They are between a rock and a hard place. Then are way outgunned when it comes to technical expertise and therefore have to trample all over people to get anything done. I think the readers of this list could probably develop a system that would make the FBI's job a lot easier (as far as evidence gathering for computers) and make everyone feel "a little" better after a search, at least they could still have their computer.
Yes, if the feds had public support and if those in the know took the time to educate them, then there'd be a lot less heartache. -d -- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
Attachment:
david.vcf
Description: Card for David Ford
Current thread:
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Implications for "Looking around?" [FBI confiscation of allegely curious student] David Ford (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Implications for "Looking around?" [FBI confiscation of allegely curious student] David Ford (Nov 02)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Implications for "Looking around?" [FBI confiscation of allegely curious student] Ben Ford (Nov 02)