Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] Testing of Netscreen firewalls?
From: "Jensen, Greg" <Greg_Jensen () NAI COM>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:59:11 -0700
Robert, We market the Netscreen product as a cheaper, yet less secure, alternative to our Gauntlet Firewall/WebShield E-ppliance. We have had great success with the product as it is one of the most well-rounded low-end solutions we have put our hands on. I would recomend it if money is tight. There are cases where you don't need a sledgehammer to put a nail in, so in a case like that, the Netscreen does fine. In those cases where you have high liabilities if proprietary information is stolen, or e-biz servers can be compromised, you really should stick with the higher level boxes such as Gauntlet/E-ppliance or other "proxy" based firewalls that cut the connection from the untrusted to the trusted networks. -----Original Message----- From: Masse, Robert [mailto:rmasse () RICHTER CA] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:45 PM To: PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM Subject: [PEN-TEST] Testing of Netscreen firewalls? Hi Has anyone had any negative experience with the Netscreen 10/100 products? I am starting to look at a cheaper alternative to PIX and FW1 (for the smaller companies) and wanted to know what you think of the product. I checked around the security portals for bugs or exploits and found none (however the product is relatively new and not common yet). Thanks in advance, Robert Robert Masse, CISSP Chief Technical Officer Richter Security Inc. 2 Place Alexis Nihon, suite 905 Montreal, Quebec, Canada +514 934-3566 Direct +514 934-3406 Fax
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] Testing of Netscreen firewalls? Masse, Robert (Sep 08)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Testing of Netscreen firewalls? Alfred Huger (Sep 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Testing of Netscreen firewalls? Dunker, Noah (Sep 08)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Testing of Netscreen firewalls? Jensen, Greg (Sep 08)