RE: buffer overflow offsets?

[axez () bigfoot com]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There is a possibility that exploits you have tried were slightly altered by
their authors to make it harder to use for script kiddies.


AxeZ
On 09-Jul-2001 Ivan D Nestlerode wrote:
> Is there a general method for determining the proper
> offset for buffer overflow exploits?
>
> The context here is a pen test where I have
> gleaned enough information about the target machine
> to know that it is running vulnerable network services.
> I found exploits for these services, but none of them
> worked properly. I suspects the offsets are not correct.
>
> How does one go about tuning these offsets (assuming
> I don't know the exact architecture of the target machine
> and that I don't have any account on that machine)?
>
> Thanks in advance for any information,
> Ivan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
> This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
> Service
> For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts
> you to 
> the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
>
> https://alerts.securityfocus.com/

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjtMXFwACgkQrYPSDdLHTIArowCeOR4zyUHOFvkjPJynh9f1YCKq
YYgAmgJsyQyGepCyxMW6rGXZw7U6RipW
=GF7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/