Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: Thankyou


From: hellNbak <hellnbak () nmrc org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:15:18 -0600 (CST)

Would you not have had an NDA with your client and should this not have
been covered under such an NDA?  It should be up to your client to take
action on this one.

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 saraf () hushmail com wrote:

Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:04:04 -0800
From: saraf () hushmail com
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Thankyou


To everyone who sent me mail on my earlier topic thankyou. We are working
with two of the vendors now and will contact the third shortly. The machine
FWIW was shut down as soon as we discovered the issue and the client
was notified.

sara

----------------------------------------------------------------------
gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
gpg: Signature made Wed 26 Mar 2003 04:08:23 PM CST using DSA key ID 508994DB
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
----------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"

hellNbak () nmrc org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway.
SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses
and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much
junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial:
http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1


Current thread: