Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Wireless Pent-Test
From: Cedric Blancher <blancher () cartel-securite fr>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:10:36 +0200
Le mar 07/10/2003 à 11:00, Raistlin a écrit :
WEP (RC4, in fact) can be cracked, AND it also suffers from weak initialization vectors.
This could be understood as "RC4 could be cracked", implying RC4 is weak, which is not true when used properly. WEP can be cracked because because it make a quite poor use of RC4. -- http://www.netexit.com/~sid/ PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tired of constantly searching the web for the latest exploits? Tired of using 300 different tools to do one job? Get CORE IMPACT and get some rest. www.coresecurity.com/promos/sf_ept2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Wireless Pent-Test Cesar Diaz (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Daniel Nylander (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Leeds (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test R. DuFresne (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Gregory Spath (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Seth Fogie (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Michael Sierchio (Oct 07)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Christopher Harrington (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Raistlin (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Cedric Blancher (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Raistlin (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Leeds (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Daniel Nylander (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test n0g0013 (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test goat (Oct 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Artes, Francisco (Oct 06)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Wagenknecht (Oct 06)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test MJohnst5 (Oct 06)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Keith T. Morgan (Oct 06)