Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ?
From: Jim Morgan <peripatetic () myrealbox com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:38:14 +0800
At 18:41 24/11/2004, William Allsopp wrote:
Superscan 3 seemed to have various issues accurately detecting common network services, particularly SMTP,FTP and H.323 for some reason, even on short haul networks. Superscan 4 is marginally better, but I'd suggest Mingsweeper from hoobie.net as a good windows port scanner.
Just took a look at these ... Superscan 3 is 4 years old, and Mingsweeper is 3 years old and stopped development shortly before reaching beta stage. Aren't there any more recent reeware scanners around? Or did all the authors go commercial ...
J.
Current thread:
- Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Petr . Kazil (Nov 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Peter Wood (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- RE: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Jerry Shenk (Nov 24)
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Dave McCormick (Nov 24)
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Anders Thulin (Nov 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? William Allsopp (Nov 24)
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Jim Morgan (Nov 27)
- RE: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Brewis, Mark (Nov 25)
- RE: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Evans, Arian (Nov 27)
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Donald Whitfield (Nov 27)
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Donald Whitfield (Nov 27)
- Re: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Donald Whitfield (Nov 27)
- RE: Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ? Evans, Arian (Nov 27)