Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT
From: Steve Friedl <steve () unixwiz net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:44:56 -0700
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:37:23PM -0400, intel96 wrote:
I would argue that the term licensed penetration tester has very little weight. When I see the term licensed I think of doctors, nurses, lawyers, and others that have to take board exams in the states where they want to practice their trade.
"Licensure" grants a legal right in the public domain (as opposed to a contract, which grants a legal claim against another), and as such can only be issued by a government agency. They typically are thought of as granting the right to engage in professional trade (doctor, lawyer, PE, barber), but they also are used for more mundane activities, such as a driver's license, a marriage license, or a fishing license. If it's not from the government, it's not a real license. What's being discussed here is "Certification", and I think we all know the difference. Steve --- Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | +1 714 544-6561 www.unixwiz.net | Tustin, Calif. USA | Microsoft MVP | steve () unixwiz net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Licensed Penetration Tester LPT cenkornek (Apr 17)
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Paul A Ryan (Apr 17)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT rob havelt (Apr 17)
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Richard Zaluski (Apr 17)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Mambo (Apr 17)
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT James Boomer (Apr 19)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Mambo (Apr 19)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT intel96 (Apr 19)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Steve Friedl (Apr 20)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Dogten (Apr 23)
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT James Boomer (Apr 20)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Pete Herzog (Apr 23)
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT James Boomer (Apr 19)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Maudite MLRL (Apr 19)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Dogten (Apr 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Clemens, Dan (Apr 17)
- RE: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Mark Teicher (Apr 19)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Mark Teicher (Apr 20)
- Re: Licensed Penetration Tester LPT Mark Teicher (Apr 24)