Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: sniffing plaintext protocols
From: Dotzero <dotzero () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:10:41 -0400
On 8/1/06, itsec.info <itsec.info () gmail com> wrote:
From a security point of view it is a fundamental question whether such a scenario is technically possible or not. If so, how do I have to assess such a risk, how can I check that at a penetration test and how about the mitigation.
Mike, The answer is to avoid using plaintext protocols. About the only plaintext protocol I can think of any argument for would be ftp (which I would limit to anonymous logins). If at all possible I would force users to use scp, sftp or ftps. As far as checking during a penetration test,.....if they are using plaintext protocols then you ahve your answer. While this may sound like an extreme statement to some, continued use of plaintext protocols in todays environment can generally be attributed to laziness or ignorance. I'd love to hear someone make a case that use of plaintext protocols (other than http for general web browsing) is a best (or even acceptable) practice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: CenzicConcerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols itsec.info (Aug 01)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Dotzero (Aug 09)
- Message not available
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Dotzero (Aug 10)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Gary E. Miller (Aug 10)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Tonnerre Lombard (Aug 11)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols itsec.info (Aug 11)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Joachim Schipper (Aug 11)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Tonnerre Lombard (Aug 15)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols killy (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Dotzero (Aug 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Shreyas Zare (Aug 09)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols dfullert (Aug 10)
- Re: sniffing plaintext protocols Shreyas Zare (Aug 10)