Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: RE: l0phtcrack
From: wymerzp () sbu edu
Date: 30 Oct 2006 04:06:10 -0000
Thanks to all who responded, I resolved the issue through sectools.org. It is an impressive tool; lc5 took mere seconds to break a user account on my computer(consisting of a word and one number) while (even under strong password auditing) with default settings lc5 didn't break my password for the admin account. NOTA BENE: Please don't assume that I feel impenetrable because of this, for there are more than one way to skin a cat as the addage goes. It is just very interesting to see the difference between a strong and a weak password! This really put things into perspective. Thanks again! Peace, Zach ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- l0phtcrack wymerzp (Oct 27)
- Re: l0phtcrack ml01 (Oct 28)
- RE: l0phtcrack Steve Armstrong (Oct 29)
- RE: l0phtcrack Don Kelloway (Oct 28)
- RE: l0phtcrack ROPERT François (Oct 28)
- Re: l0phtcrack Clint Lists (Oct 29)
- RE: l0phtcrack Steve Armstrong (Oct 29)
- Re: l0phtcrack Gareth Davies (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: l0phtcrack (Oct 28)
- RE: l0phtcrack cyph3r (Oct 29)
- Re: RE: l0phtcrack wymerzp (Oct 29)
- Re: l0phtcrack ml01 (Oct 28)