Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?
From: alan <alan () clueserver org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:46:07 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, jezzzz . wrote:
I have some time on my hands (about two months) to work on a new network protocol fuzzer which I intend to write in Python. I don't have much experience in Python but my intention is to learn it by writing the fuzzer. I am looking for a protocol which is interesting and does not yet have a fuzzer for it. IMAP and RIP for instance already seem to have fuzzers. Anyone any ideas for other protocols?
SILC? -- "Invoking the supernatural can explain anything, and hence explains nothing." - University of Utah bioengineering professor Gregory Clark ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? jezzzz . (Feb 20)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? alan (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Kurt Buff (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? lobo (Feb 21)
- RE: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Paul Melson (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Chris Byrd (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Tim (Feb 23)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? jezzzz . (Feb 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? fiqbal (Feb 21)