Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
From: "Utmost Bastard" <utmostbastard () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:32:09 -0400
Other then delivering a payload with a forged packet you will have to proxy through something.
If you are reverse tunneling a shell it will need to relay through a proxy of sorts also if you truly need the originating IP concealed.
Basically anything other then a one way connection is going to need a valid address to relay the data back and forth from.
The first and only truly reliable thing I can think of is a good fast socks proxy.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vivek P" <iamherevivek () gmail com>
To: "Utmost Bastard" <utmostbastard () gmail com>Cc: <security-basics () securityfocus com>; "Pen-Testing" <pen-test () securityfocus com>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 4:15 PM Subject: Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
hi thanks for the quick reply my goal is to hide my ip adress, the n/w packets will be pentest related & general stuff! there is no torrent, but FTP, HTTP & regular communications will take place from the setup! I am looking for a solution with which i can permanently show a different IP adress! (not actual) i did try creating packets, the problem is that the reply doesnt come back to me!! I was successful to broadcast a packet outside & it came back too.. but it was traceable (i used a carrier)... :-( i would appretiate some one discussins techncalities. I am okay with coding a program fr the same! On 9/14/07, Utmost Bastard <utmostbastard () gmail com> wrote:PeerGuardian just uses preset "block lists" of IP addresses to function. Ifan IP address is met any protocol/port transferring or receiving data is blocked at the network layer. I do not think that is the goal you are trying to achieve.If this is for traffic such as torrent your IP will still be known from the tracker itself but you will not be sending or receiving data from any of theIP addresses you have in your list. http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php ironically has a torrent to download the latest blocklist set. Hopefully this clears any questions up. UB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vivek P" <iamherevivek () gmail com> To: <security-basics () securityfocus com>; "Pen-Testing" <pen-test () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:52 PM Subject: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss > hi all > > I am on a lookout for IP hiding & anonymity for a project of mine! > > I was googlin for some time now! most amusing one that i came across > was that of Peer Guardian.. > > I wanted to get directions frm hw best can i get my identity hidden! > atleast without using a proxy server from some providers (like > anonymiser)... > > the link for Peer Guardian is here: http://phoenixlabs.org/pg2/ > > I m pretty sure someone would have tried it.. > > I am testing it as i am writing this query... > > thanks in advance > ------------------------------------------- > Vivek P Nair > VP Tech > Appin Group Of Companies > Appin Security Group > Module III TBIU > IIT DELHI > Hauz Khaus > New delhi > India > www.appinlabs.com > vivek.p () appinlabs com > > We explore... and you call us criminals. > We seek after knowledge... and you call us criminals. > We exist without skin color, without nationality, without religious > bias... and you call us criminals. > You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to > us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the > criminals. > > Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. > My crime is that of judging people by what they say and think, not > what they look like. > I am a hacker, and this is my manifesto. > You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This list is sponsored by: Cenzic > > Need to secure your web apps NOW? > Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. > Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! > > http://www.cenzic.com/downloads > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >-- ------------------------------------------- Vivek P Nair Vice President Technology Appin Group Of Companies Appin Security Group Module III TBIU IIT DELHI Hauz Khaus New delhi India www.appinlabs.com vivek.p () appinlabs com +919910924675 We explore... and you call us criminals. We seek after knowledge... and you call us criminals. We exist without skin color, without nationality, without religious bias... and you call us criminals. You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the criminals. Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. My crime is that of judging people by what they say and think, not what they look like. I am a hacker, and this is my manifesto.You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Utmost Bastard (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Utmost Bastard (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 14)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Dotzero (Sep 14)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 16)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 16)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 16)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 17)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 17)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Utmost Bastard (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Dotzero (Sep 17)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 17)