Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
From: Syv Ritch <syv () 911networks com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:21:59 -0700
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:22:47 +0530 "Vivek P" <iamherevivek () gmail com> wrote:
hi all I am on a lookout for IP hiding & anonymity for a project of mine!
I wanted to get directions frm hw best can i get my identity hidden! atleast without using a proxy server from some providers (like anonymiser)...
It's actually not possible without using a proxy. Either you are using TCP or UPD packets, either way the other end has to reply to your IP address or you will not receive the replying packets. Packets without IP addresses are rejected by almost all routers as invalid packets. The only thing that you can do is a denial of service by injecting an incorrect/invalid/other IP address. -- Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss, (continued)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 14)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Dotzero (Sep 14)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 16)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 16)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 16)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 17)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 17)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Dotzero (Sep 17)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 17)