Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent
From: "Ron.Southworth" <Ron.Southworth () scadaperspective com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:17:22 +1000
Adriel you are always if nothing else good at stirring a comment. Visualisation tools are actually a good thing for humans so using GUI does not make you a neophyte. Not all GUI users are "evil nare do wells" so measuring a skill level based on someone's ability or currency to write code is a flawed assumption. It is actually pretty clever to not reinvent the wheel all the time. Visualising complex and fast moving abstracts is actually very clever so shame you miss this sort of benefit. Ron -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Adriel Desautels Sent: Friday, 5 March 2010 12:09 PM To: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Posted on: http://snosoft.blogspot.com/2010/03/good-guys-in-security-world-are-no.html Comments, insults, etc. on the blog (or here) are more than welcome. -- The Good Guys in the security world are no different from the Bad Guys; most of them are nothing more than glorified Script Kiddies. The fact of the matter is that if you took all of the self-proclaimed hackers in the world and you subjected them to a litmus test, very few would pass as actual hackers. This is true for both sides of the proverbial Black and White hat coin. In the Black Hat world, you have script-kids who download programs that are written by other people then use those programs to "hack" into networks. The White Hat's do the exact same thing; only they buy the expensive tools instead of downloading them for free. Or maybe they're actually paying for the pretty GUI, who knows? What is pitiable is that in just about all cases these script kiddies have no idea what the programs actually do. Sometimes that's because they don't bother to look at the code, but most of the time its because they just can't understand it. If you think about it that that is scary. Do you really want to work with a security company that launches attacks against your network with tools that they do not fully understand? I sure wouldn't. This is part of the reason why I feel that it is so important for any professional security services provider to maintain an active research team. I'm not talking about doing market research and pretending that its security research like so many security companies do. I'm talking about doing actual vulnerability research and exploit development to help educate people about risks for the purposes of defense. After all, if a security company can't write an exploit then what business do they have launching exploits against your company? I am very proud to say that Everything Channel recently released the 2010 CRN Security Researchers list and that Netragard's Kevin Finisterre was on the list. Other people that were included in the list are people that I have the utmost respect for. As far as I am concerned, these are the top security experts: * Dino Dai Zovi * Kevin Finisterre * Landon Fuller * Robert Graham * Jeremiah Grossman * Larry Highsmith * Billy Hoffman * Mikko Hypponen * Dan Kaminsky * Paul Kocher * Nate Lawson * David Litchfield * Charles Miller * Jeff Moss * Jose Nazario * Joanna Rutkowska In the end I suppose it all boils down to what the customer wants. Some customers want to know their risks; others just want to put a check in the box. For those who want to know what their real risks are, you've come to the right place. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified. http://www.iacertification.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified. http://www.iacertification.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Adriel Desautels (Mar 08)
- RE: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Ron.Southworth (Mar 08)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Adriel T. Desautels (Mar 11)
- RE: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Porttikivi, Anssi (Mar 15)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Wim Remes (Mar 08)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Adriel T. Desautels (Mar 09)
- RE: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Craig S. Wright (Mar 11)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Adriel T. Desautels (Mar 11)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Wim Remes (Mar 11)
- RE: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Ron.Southworth (Mar 08)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Vikram Dhillon (Mar 09)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent Omar Herrera (Mar 09)
- Re: Professional Scrpt Kiddies vs Real Talent chr1x (Mar 11)