Politech mailing list archives
FC: Why does Silicon Valley vote against itself? by J.Glassman
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:26:26 -0500
http://www.spectator.org/archives/0103TAS/glassman0103.htm The American Spectator -- March 2001 Smart Nerds, Foolish Choices Why Silicon Valley votes against its interests by James K. Glassman One of the deepest mysteries of this New Age is why Silicon Valley -- as a geographic metaphor for smart, productive high-technologists around the country--prefers Democrats to Republicans. In the presidential election, for example, voters in the two counties in the peninsula south of San Francisco--Santa Mateo and Santa Clara -- chose Al Gore over George W. Bush, 63 percent to 32 percent, with 4 percent for Ralph Nader. Republicans have given far more support to the issues that high-tech executives say are dear to them: expanding visas for skilled immigrants, giving China the same trade status as other countries, limiting the power of trial lawyers to blackmail technology companies for damages over Y2K software failures and practically anything else. "If you look at all these issues," says Rep. Dick Armey, "Republicans are their friends." So what's the problem? Rick White--the former Republican congressman for the Washington state district that includes Redmond, home of Microsoft -- told me that shortly after the GOP sweep in 1994, Bill Gates sat down with Newt Gingrich. "Why don't more high-tech execs support us?" the new speaker asked. "We are the party of entrepreneurial values." Gates replied: "We do agree on business and economic issues, but we have hesitation on social issues." A few years later, when Bill Clinton's Justice Department went after Microsoft on antitrust charges, Gates learned that, for a high-tech CEO, business issues trump social issues. But most of his colleagues haven't absorbed that lesson yet. Last year, Armey, the House majority leader, went to Silicon Valley to drum up support for his "e-contract"--a set of bills to help tech firms, including setting a standard for digital signatures and keeping a moratorium on new Internet taxes. Armey spoke for half an hour, then invited questions from the floor. The tech executives ignored the substance of his talk and instead asked questions that might have come from a gathering of the Urban League or the National Organization for Women. The final question to a flabbergasted Armey: "Why is it that you Republicans are so obsessed about abortion?" Why is Silicon Valley oblivious to the policy concerns that can shape the economy and their own businesses? "My explanation for it," Armey told me, "is that they have prospered for all these years, independent of government and indifferent to it.... They came at politics from a personal point of view. Then, all of a sudden, things changed, and they didn't seem to be able to make the transition from the politics of the heart to the politics of the brain." In other words, the opposition to Republicans appears almost aesthetic. Yes, Democrats may have tastes that fit better with Silicon Valley lifestyles. Democrats and Valley technologists may like the same music, drink the same latte, drive the same model of Volvo. But they don't share Silicon Valley's ideas about the New Economy. In the end, Democrats want to run your business. They are on the side of higher taxes, more regulation, more lawsuits. It is snobbish and shortsighted for Silicon Valley technologists and entrepreneurs to shun a party that shares their free-market values but, perhaps, not their styles and tastes. [...] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: Why does Silicon Valley vote against itself? by J.Glassman Declan McCullagh (Mar 15)