Politech mailing list archives
Two replies to column about Congress can't code good laws
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 01:01:54 -0400
-------- Original Message --------Subject: Re: [Politech] Weekly column: Why Congress can't code good tech laws
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:53:25 -0400 From: Chey Cobb, CISSP <chey () patriot net> To: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> References: <40A3C95D.1020006 () well com> Declan, I couldn't agree with this opinion more strongly! In my work with the government, I found that most politicians (and political appointees) have no desire to understand the core of new technology - even when given the chance. Case in point ... when I was on the review committee of the new computer security regulations for the intelligence communities (DCID 6/3 http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/DCID_6-3_20Policy.htm), I tried to get inaccurate and misleading explanations of technology changed to reflect correct and appropriate explanations. I submitted alternate text numerous times, only to have my changes completely dismissed. In the end, I discovered that the person show was in charge of the final text had no technical expertise whatsoever. In his former position he had been a high school English teacher. ('Nuff said.) Chey -------- Original Message --------Subject: RE: [Politech] Weekly column: Why Congress can't code good tech laws
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:34:11 -0400 From: Lin, Herb <HLin () nas edu> To: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>, <politech () politechbot com> >http://news.com.com/2010-1014_3-5209091.html > >Bad laws, bad code, bad behavior >May 10, 2004, 10:00 AM PT >By Declan McCullagh > >A congressional hearing on Internet porn last week illustrates what >happens when politicians try to ban technology they don't like or >understand. Remainder eliminated... == This is a standard complaint of the cyber-libertarians - and quite understandable. But the solution usually proposed - for the politicians/policy makers to stay out - simply does not reflect reality. The operational choice you have is - get involved in some way to educate the policy makers (in which case they have a better chance of passing more informed laws), or stay away from the tainted enterprise (in which case ill-informed laws will be more likely to pass). That's reality - and politech fans have to deal with it. Herb (personal views alone)[I think Herb has spent too long in DC and has gone native. My complaint is not a "cyber-libertarian" one, but common to folks with technical backgrounds who have to interface with the clue-impaired political class. Also, I explicitly proposed a solution in the rest of the column I did not excerpt -- not "stay out" but a better way to craft laws. --Declan]
_______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
Current thread:
- Two replies to column about Congress can't code good laws Declan McCullagh (May 13)