Secure Coding mailing list archives
RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding
From: "Peter Amey" <peter.amey () praxis-cs co uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:47:08 +0100
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael S Hines Sent: 20 July 2004 14:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SC-L] Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding I've been compiling a list of programming languages.. Some of which were developed to 'solve' the insecure programming problem. I don't think we've made it yet. Perhaps it's a personnel problem, not a technology problem?
True. Except that a major part of the "personnel problem" is the refusal of the personnel to be open minded and objective about their choice of technology! Peter ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. The IT Department at Praxis Critical Systems can be contacted at [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ********************************************************************** ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Kenneth R. van Wyk (Jul 19)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Michael S Hines (Jul 20)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Dave Aronson (Jul 20)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Mark Rockman (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding ljknews (Jul 20)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Erik van Konijnenburg (Jul 21)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding der Mouse (Jul 20)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Crispin Cowan (Jul 21)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Craig E. Ward (Jul 22)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding James Walden (Jul 21)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Dave Aronson (Jul 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Peter Amey (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Wall, Kevin (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Nick Lothian (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Michael S Hines (Jul 22)
- Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Mark Rockman (Jul 23)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Nick Lothian (Aug 02)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding ljknews (Aug 02)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Michael S Hines (Jul 20)