Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin () immunix com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 13:00:36 +0100
ljknews wrote:
At 8:05 AM -0400 5/2/05, Kenneth R. van Wyk wrote:Yet, despite that pessimistic outlook -- and the survey that forked this thread -- I do think that companies are demanding more in software security, even though consumers are not.Companies value time spent on cleanup more than consumers do.
And in this morning's mailbox, we see some evidence to support the claim that business is considerably less impressed with software quality http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=IMYCZLJPHKPNMQSNDBCSKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleID=161601417 Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ CTO, Immunix http://immunix.com
Current thread:
- Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (Apr 30)
- RE: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Arian J. Evans (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Greenarrow 1 (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Dave Aronson (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Jeff Williams (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Michael Silk (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Kenneth R. van Wyk (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable ljknews (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 03)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Michael Silk (May 03)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Bill Cheswick (May 02)
- Re: re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Gunnar Peterson (May 02)
- Re: re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Blue Boar (May 03)