Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault?
From: ljknews <ljknews () mac com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:03:29 +0100
At 7:44 AM -0400 4/7/05, Dave Paris wrote:
What you're proposing is that the ironworker should reengineer the bridge in-situ (as if he even has the authority!)
or the expertise. -- Larry Kilgallen
Current thread:
- Adding some unexpected reliability expectations, (continued)
- Adding some unexpected reliability expectations ljknews (Apr 13)
- Re: Adding some unexpected reliability expectations Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Apr 13)
- Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 13)
- Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Dave Paris (Apr 13)
- Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 14)
- Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Dave Paris (Apr 14)
- Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Damir Rajnovic (Apr 11)
- RE: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Yousef Syed (Apr 11)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Dave Paris (Apr 07)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 07)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? ljknews (Apr 07)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Julie JCH Ryan, D.Sc. (Apr 08)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Crispin Cowan (Apr 08)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? George Capehart (Apr 19)
- Re: [ot] Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Pete Shanahan (Apr 10)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? secureCoding2dave (Apr 07)
- RE: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Yousef Syed (Apr 10)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 06)
- Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Jeff Williams (Apr 06)