Snort mailing list archives
Re: Professionalism
From: Guillaume <guillaume () anteria fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:29:46 +0100 (CET)
Hi. I do not want to feed the troll about Joe complaining about snort's professionalism based on a joke in conf files, but I think that snort's "professionalism" could be discussed with more benefits for all snorters based on things like : - having quite as many different ways to define variables as preprocessors; - having quite as many different output formats as output plugins (annoying when you want to centralize logs & analysis methods !!)... I would just ask Marty : is there or will there be a unified way of defining variables in snort main conf file in future snort versions, and are you (when I write "you" I mean: snort developpers team, not just Marty !!) planning to state about a guideline for all that ? Best regards. Guillaume. ********************************** Sent with HORDE/IMP _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Professionalism Joe Smith (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Guillaume (Nov 14)
- Re: Professionalism Brian (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Erek Adams (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Phil Wood (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Gordon Ewasiuk (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Joe Smith (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Jon Bentley (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism George D. Nincehelser (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism olliecat (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Gordon Ewasiuk (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)