Snort mailing list archives
Re: nimda rule interpretation
From: Joe McAlerney <joey () SiliconDefense com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 12:27:57 -0800
Hi John, You really need to look at the packet payload to determine if it's a false positive. Snort doesn't log it by default, you need to use -d.
From there, compare the payload to an actual packet capture of the
worm. I imagine that url in the rule will have one. Hope this helps, -Joe M. -- Joe McAlerney Software Developer / Security Consultant joey () SiliconDefense com Silicon Defense: IDS Solutions -=- http://www.silicondefense.com/
John Rodley wrote: I'm a new snort user managing a small corporate network. I need confirmation that my interpretation of this snort alert is correct. syslog entry: 12-05-2001 09:00:25 Auth.Alert a.a.a.a snort[588]: [1:1294:2] NETBIOS nimda .nws [Classification: Potentially Bad Traffic] [Priority: 2]: {TCP} a.b.c.d:4003 -> w.x.y.z:139 snort log entry: [**] NETBIOS nimda .nws [**] 12/05-08:28:37.632972 a.b.c.d:4003 -> w.x.y.z:139 TCP TTL:128 TOS:0x0 ID:48598 IpLen:20 DgmLen:636 DF ***AP*** Seq: 0xDF858CCB Ack: 0x48C607FC Win: 0x40A7 TcpLen: 20 =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ netbios.rule being triggered alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 139 (msg:"NETBIOS nimda .nws"; content:"|00|N|00|W|00|S"; flags:A+; classtype:bad-unknown; reference:url,www.datafellows.com/v-descs/nimda.shtml; sid:1294; rev:2;) My interpretation of this is that a.b.c.d transmitted the string "NWS" over a connection from source port 4003 to destination port 139 on w.x.y.z. Would that be correct? Suspecting this is a false positive since both machines scan clean. John Rodley
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- nimda rule interpretation John Rodley (Dec 05)
- Re: nimda rule interpretation Joe McAlerney (Dec 05)