Snort mailing list archives
RE: SNORT DROPPING PACKETS
From: Greg Herlein <gherlein () herlein com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:17:29 -0800 (PST)
I was surprised to find this isn't listed in the manual or the FAQ list. It's been covered repeatedly on the list. On Unix systems send SIGUSR1 to the Snort process: kill -USR1 <snort_pid> I don't know how on Win32 systems. Linux systems require patching to make this work as far as I can tell. I never found out how on a 2.4 system, so I switched to FreeBSD.
This is the kind of anti-linux FUD that sometimes really annoys me. Of course sending signals works on linux - you don't need a patch. It works fine - I just did it on a stock SuSE 2.4.4 kernel and a 2.4.14 kernel - both production machines. Nothing against FreeBSD - that's a fine OS as well. But geesh, check your facts about linux. Now Win32 - that's another story. I won't go there. Greg _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- SNORT DROPPING PACKETS Bartholomew Simpson (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SNORT DROPPING PACKETS Crow, Owen (Dec 22)
- RE: SNORT DROPPING PACKETS Greg Herlein (Dec 23)
- RE: SNORT DROPPING PACKETS Crow, Owen (Dec 23)
- Re: SNORT DROPPING PACKETS Chris Green (Dec 23)
- Re: SNORT DROPPING PACKETS Phil Wood (Dec 23)
- Incident Identification Frank Reid (Dec 23)
- Re: Incident Identification Phil Wood (Dec 23)
- same SRC/DST James (Dec 24)
- Re: same SRC/DST Kyle R Maxwell (Dec 25)
- Re: same SRC/DST James (Dec 25)
- Re: same SRC/DST Ashley Thomas (Dec 25)
- Re: Incident Identification (data in TCP syn packet) Matt Kettler (Dec 26)