Snort mailing list archives

RE: v1.7 on NT4 - Can't get my own RULES working?? help.


From: Bryce Stenberg <bryce () hrnz co nz>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:58:50 +1300

Hi,

Since I don't currently have the time to do another upgrade and 1.7 was a
stable working version on NT4 - can anyone please comment on how to run only
your 'local.rules' with only preprocessors of 'defrag' and 'http_decode' -
ie. apart from commenting out all the snort.conf 'includes' and other
preprocessors what am I missing such that even an 'any <> any' style rule
doesn't work?

I'm assuming there is nothing wrong with my rules that I defined? (see
previous message below) - if there is something obviously wrong there can
you please let me know.

Thanks for your help - sorry if you have to dredge your memories now for 1.7
version way of doing things (although I would have hoped that 1.8 worked in
the same fashion).

Regards,
  Bryce Stenberg.
     Harness Racing New Zealand computer department,
     emailto:bryce () hrnz co nz

-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Work [mailto:wwork () cybergnostic com]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 12:34 p.m.
To: Bryce Stenberg; snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] v1.7 on NT4 - Can't get my own RULES
working?? help.


First of all,

If you are using 1.7 please upgrade NOW. Things will be much brighter

 -----Original Message-----
From:         snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net
[mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net]  On Behalf Of Bryce
Stenberg
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 5:53 PM
To:   'snort-users () lists sourceforge net'
Subject:      [Snort-users] v1.7 on NT4 - Can't get my own 
RULES working?? help.

Hi,

I'm new to snort and first time user on this list - so 
firstly, I've looked
in the archives but could find no way to do a key word search. Is this
possible?    Anyway, sorry if repeating something often asked...

PROBLEM:
I've had snort running for a number of months ok with just 
the default rules
set.  However, there is so much activity from attack attempts 
that I decided
to not use all the rules and look instead for strings 
matching information
on our servers that should not be passing out over the internet (like
certain directory names, etc). This way I'll only get alerted 
to actual
successful penetrations/compromise of the network, at least I hope so.

So, I created a couple of rules of:

alert tcp any any <> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Outgoing directory 
listing via
tcp"; content: "enticing_directory_name"; nocase; flags: PA; 
priority:10;)

alert udp any any <> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Outgoing directory 
listing via
udp"; content: "enticing_directory_name"; nocase;  flags: PA; 
priority:10;)
.

I altered 'snort.conf' to NOT run any of the includes at end 
of file. Also
stopped all preprocessors except 'defrag' and 'http_decode'.

I initially placed my rules in 'local.rules' file but that 
had no effect -
do I have to 'include' a certain lib file (at end of 
'snort.conf') to be
able to use 'local.rules' file?

Anyway, I next added my rules to the end of 'backdoor.rules' file and
uncommented the 'include backdoor-lib' since I expect that 
makes use of
backdoor.rules.

I then tested again (by ftp'ing directory listings and text 
files containing
the content string from the server running snort so the 
packets had to be
seen by snort).  Still no alert outputs?

So can anyone offer me advice on how to get it working please?
I hope the above enough information but if more needed just ask.
If its a problem with my actual rules, I have also tried various
combinations in the header like:
alert tcp any any <> any any (
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET any (
alert tcp any any <- $HOME_NET any (
  etc....

Regards,
  Bryce Stenberg.
     Harness Racing New Zealand computer department,
     emailto:bryce () hrnz co nz


CAUTION: This email message and accompanying data may contain 
information
that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you 
are not the
intended recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message or data is 
prohibited. If you have
received this email message in error please notify us 
immediately and erase
all copies of the message and attachments.
 ALSO, unless expressly stated otherwise, the contents of this message
represent only the views of the sender as expressed only to 
the intended
recipient, do not commit Harness Racing New Zealand (HRNZ) to 
any course of
action and are not intended to impose any legal obligation upon HRNZ.



_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users



CAUTION: This email message and accompanying data may contain information
that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you have
received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase
all copies of the message and attachments.
 ALSO, unless expressly stated otherwise, the contents of this message
represent only the views of the sender as expressed only to the intended
recipient, do not commit Harness Racing New Zealand (HRNZ) to any course of
action and are not intended to impose any legal obligation upon HRNZ.



_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: