Snort mailing list archives
Re: host-specificity in dynamic rules?
From: Chris Green <cmg () uab edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 13:25:08 -0600
Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt () is rice edu> writes:
1. Is there a way for an activate/dynamic rule pair to zero in on the specific hosts detected by the activate rule? i.e., if I were to write:
activate tcp !$HOME_NET any -> $HOME_NET 23 (flags:S+; activates:1; \ msg:"Telnet SYN";) dynamic TCP !$HOME_NET any -> $HOME_NET 23 (activated_by:1; count:10;)
use tagging alert tcp !$HOME_NET any -> $HOME_NET 23 (flags:S+; msg:"Telnet SYN";\ tag: host, 10, seconds;) to get the binary logs
2. More generally, is there further documentation available on activate/dynamic pairs? Nothing in the FAQ, and the example in the USAGE file is very generic.
It's original purpose was replaced with tags. Tags will be fleshed out more in the future ( 2.0 era ) -- Chris Green <cmg () uab edu> This is my signature. There are many like it but this one is mine. _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- host-specificity in dynamic rules? Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt (Jan 08)
- Re: host-specificity in dynamic rules? Chris Green (Jan 08)