Snort mailing list archives
Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () nfr com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 09:37:17 -0500
Lance Spitzner wrote:
However, I was just thinking, why bother deploying the box? Why not create a list of Snort rules that generate an alert whenever a TCP/SYN packet or UDP packet is sent to an IP address that has no system? This could incidate a probe, scan or attack, the same principles of a honeypot, but without deploying an actual system.
For that matter, couldn't you _almost_ put something like that together using filtering rules in a router? Syslog 'em off the router and process 'em on a backend system. mjr. _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot, (continued)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ofir Arkin (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ryan Russell (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Earthlink (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Alex Collins (Mar 08)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Michael Clark (Mar 08)
- Re: RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ashley Thomas (Mar 08)
- Re: RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ryan Russell (Mar 08)
- Re: RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ashley Thomas (Mar 08)
- Re: RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Frank Knobbe (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Rob Thomas (Mar 08)