Snort mailing list archives
RE: *NIX ping alerts
From: Jason Gauthier <jgauthier () lastar com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:55:33 -0400
I'll give that a try. Thanks.
Not sure how a NAT'd packet from a single monitoring node could have one
of 256 addresses.
Sounds fishy...
Because my firewall has a pool of public addresses it gives to an outbound connection. It translates between them: Note, these IP addresses are fake. Public Private ------ -------- 130.19.11.45 => 10.10.1.100 This only holds in the xlate table for 5 minutes. When it connects the next time it could be: Public Private ------ -------- 130.19.11.119 => 10.10.1.100 So, really, not 256 addresses, my pool is like 90. ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- *NIX ping alerts Jason Gauthier (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: *NIX ping alerts McCammon, Keith (Jun 24)
- RE: *NIX ping alerts Jason Gauthier (Jun 24)
- RE: *NIX ping alerts McCammon, Keith (Jun 24)
- RE: *NIX ping alerts Jason Gauthier (Jun 24)