Re: snort sees no fragmented attack

[Holger.Woehle () arcor net]

> Well, in 1.9 w/ a 1.9 ruleset, you should turn on
>
> preprocessor stream4: asynchronous_link
>
> you are running into the state machines actually caring about the
> state of a TCP session which it can't ascertain w/o haivng both sides
> of the conversation.
>
> This is not related to fragmentation.
> --
> Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
> A good pun is its own reword.

> Holger.Woehle () arcor net writes:

> > echo "GET /aaaaaaa/aaa/aaaaa/aaaaaaaa/aaaaaaa/bcc/bin/ps" | nc
>
> The Sensor listens behind a Shomiti Ethernet TAP.
> May this be the problem ?  The Sensor only catches the
> "incoming" traffic. I do not want the answers from the machines.  Am
> i wrong with that ? Does snort neeed the outgoing traffic for defrag
> ?
...i switched on the asynchronous_link but it doesn't change anything.
I noticed that i cannot use the "flow" option even with asynchronous link...
Snort 1.9 does not recognize the alarms declared with
"flow:to_server,established" .

cu
Holger








-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users