Snort mailing list archives
Re: snort performance vs traffic
From: Erek Adams <erek () theadamsfamily net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Tim Prendergast wrote:
Curious to see what you are running in comparison to my config, because my snort is running out of memory and dying every day during the busy hours. We're pushing like 4 T-1's worth of traffic coming in from the net, not to mention the traffic from our internal machines across the 100mb switch I am snorting. It's on a box with a 500mhz PIII and 256mb of memory. Am I way under-arming this machine for this task?
Tim, it sounds like you're getting bitten by an older bit of code. IIRC, that was an issue with an older version but has now been fixed. If you're not already, try the 1.8.7 release[0] and see if that helps. If you're already running it, can you give us some more details on OS and version, disk systems, etc.? ----- Erek Adams Nifty-Type-Guy TheAdamsFamily.Net ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort performance vs traffic Tim Prendergast (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Chris Green (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Erek Adams (Jul 09)
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Tim Prendergast (Jul 09)
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Erek Adams (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Erek Adams (Jul 09)
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Tim Prendergast (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Rob Hughes (Jul 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Gray . Brendan (Jul 09)