Re: Hogwash anyone?

[Alberto Gonzalez <albertg () cerebro violating us>]

Hey Paul,

  Yeah, I've been using Hogwash for a few months. It can handle my 
cable connection with ease. My network is working fine
(see, I can send mail). My experience with Hogwash has been nothing but 
great. You should give it a shot. I still believe snort-inline
is still in its fetus stage. Also iirc snort-inline uses iptables to 
drop packets, hogwash does the dropping itself.

  - Alberto

Rochford, Paul wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just interested to hear back from anyone who has implemented hogwash 
> as a packet scrubber in a production environment. Did you see any 
> noticeable improvements/problems? Did it bring your network to a halt 
> leaving you a babbling mess in the corner?
>
> Any response / comments welcome,
>
> Paul

--
The secret to success is to start from scratch and keep on scratching.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T 
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users