Snort mailing list archives
Flex Resp and Libnet Routing
From: "Christopher Lyon" <cslyon () netsvcs com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:25:49 -0800
I saw this post a while back and it wasn't clear if something could be done to force libnet / routing to be forced out a stealth interface. Is that possible? So, mgt on eth0, sniffing on eth1 and the RST going out eth1 which is stealth? What is the final word on this? I did remember a post on this one that said it could be done but how? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=snort-users&m=103826064006091&w=2 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Flex Resp and Libnet Routing Christopher Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Flex Resp and Libnet Routing Jeff Nathan (Feb 11)