Snort mailing list archives
Re: no RPM's?
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:57:39 -0400
2003-06-19T15:24:11 Daniel Wittenberg:
I was curious why there weren't any RPM's for 2.0 yet ? Is there no longer a maintainer?
If anybody wants some snort rpms, I've got a set I use. Mine are organized as snort --- the only binary rpm, the rest are noarch, delivers /usr/bin/snort, snort(1), and a wad o' loose docs into /usr/share/doc/snort-... snort-doc --- delivers the snort user manual which I mirrored down from snort.org snort-run --- delivers init script, plus mkdirs /var/log/snort snortrules --- delivers /etc/snort from snortrules-current.tar.gz, applying one patch to make it work (editing RULE_PATH to /etc/snort), and whatever other tuning I want (at the moment I'm just #-ing out a couple of sids in bad-traffic.rules) This structure is organized around a separate rpm for each source. NB: I developed these for my own personal use; they reflect the design decisions that suited me. I'm not currently equipped with the resources to aggressively maintain these to attempt to address everyone's needs. I won't mind hearing requests for changes, I just might not honor 'em:-). Anyone who wants them is welcome, they're published at <URL:http://bent.latency.net/snort-rpms/>. Anyone is also welcome to take my packaging work and do absolutely anything with it, including putting their own name on it. -Bennett
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- no RPM's? Daniel Wittenberg (Jun 19)
- Re: no RPM's? Bennett Todd (Jun 19)