Snort mailing list archives

Re: Snort with IPSec


From: "Josh Berry" <josh.berry () netschematics com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:27:02 -0600 (CST)

Yes, we would be implementing IPSec all the way down to ALL desktops and
servers.  All network communication would be through IPSec.


Josh,

Will you be implementing IPSec VPN all the way down to the desktop/server
level or will you be using a  concentrator/router/firewall device? If you
are using one of these devices, you will have unencrypted traffic on the
LAN side where you will be able to place a Snort sensor. I suspect that
only the WAN side will be encrypted. Depending on the device, you could,
in
theory, place a sensor in-line, but... (see Chris' comment)

Regards,
Mark



                      "Josh Berry"
                      <josh.berry () netschematics co        To:
snort-users () lists sourceforge net
                      m>                                  cc:       "Josh
Berry" <josh.berry () netschematics com>,
                      Sent by:
snort-users () lists sourceforge net
                      snort-users-admin () lists sour        Subject:  Re:
[Snort-users] Snort with IPSec
                      ceforge.net


                      11/04/2003 01:02 PM






I understand the overhead and difficulty.  I just want to know if it is
technically feasible.  The reason I am asking is that one of the directors
where I work is considering implementing site wide IPSec encryption for
every connection on the internal network.  This will make internal attacks
impossible to see, therefore I cannot just sit the IDS behind the VPN
because essentially the whole network will be one big VPN.


"Josh Berry" <josh.berry () netschematics com> writes:

Are there any plugins for Snort, or is there any way with Snort, to
decrypt IPSec traffic and then analyze for malicious traffic (given
that
snort has the key to decrypt with)?  Is there any reason this would be
impossible?

Packet loss, processing time, and implementation time are the biggies :)

--
Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
 "Not everyone holds these truths to be self-evident, so we've worked
                  up a proof of them as Appendix A." --  Paul Prescod


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users













-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: