Snort mailing list archives
Re: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports
From: Jason <security () brvenik com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:16:54 -0500
Joe Patterson wrote:
right, but that's not what you had. It makes a world of difference if you write it as an equivalent to:
[...] - I had nothing. - "um, false..." is not value.- If you knew the proper answer why didn't you provide it in your first reply?
- Thx for playing. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Esler, Joel - Contractor (Jan 05)
- RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Joe Patterson (Jan 05)
- Re: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Jason (Jan 05)
- RE: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Joe Patterson (Jan 05)
- Re: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Jason (Jan 05)
- RE: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Joe Patterson (Jan 05)
- Re: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Jason (Jan 05)
- Re: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Jason (Jan 05)
- RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Joe Patterson (Jan 05)
- SFS 1.0.2 released Ophir Rachman (Jan 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RE: [Snort-sigs] ports Esler, Joel - Contractor (Jan 05)