Re: sfportscan

[JJ Truax <jtruax () optivel com>]

Thanks for the response, I guess I should have included info from my
snort.conf, I have already lowered the sense_level to low, and read all
the documentation.

This is a major problem for me. I'm going to continue to use portscan2
for now, but I hope this feature gets added soon.

JJ

> In general, I'd suggest reading both a) doc/README.sfportscan and b)
> the comments that are listed above the "preprocessor sfportscan" line
> in the snort.conf file.
>
>
>
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature