Snort mailing list archives
RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort
From: "Paul Melson" <pmelson () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:13:32 -0400
-----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort
Oh pullleeeze! I predict that Snort will be gone very soon. Let's seeeeee,
a corporate
"competitor" buys up an open-source and FREE competitor, and things will
remain the
same? Everything will continue to be free and people will continue to
develop for it?
Uh-huh. You know, I actually wouldn't mind paying a bit for Snort, but mostly
because it is/was
a "grassroots program". We support the open-sourced communities. I mean,
open-source is
all about alternatives, ingenuity and a sort of 'family'. Well folks, that
is now
history. I believe Snort has now been 'sold out'. The smartest thing for us to do is start looking for an alternative. And open-source developers need to start building a newer and better
system, if you're
a developer and want some fame and recognition, talk to me! I am no
developer, but I
know enough about just about everything IT, and even some programming
skills, and would
be glad to help. Now is the time to start!
You say the sky is falling on Snort, but I doubt it for a number of reasons. 1. The GPL will minimally allow the ongoing use and development of Snort 2.4.x regardless of what Check Point wants to do. 2. Snort is a well-known brand in the IDS market - that's value Check Point would be foolish to throw away or relinquish control of by dismantling its open source engine. 3. Check Point has not shown itself to be a company that buys up competition in order to kill it (with one notable exception - I still maintain that they bought Zone to keep Cisco from buying them and using Integrity to compete with SecureClient, but that's another story.) 4. Sourcefire is more than just Snort. NIDS is an established market, and though Snort is a standard player, it would make more sense to me that Check Point might be pursuing some of the more leading edge stuff Sourcefire offers, such as RNA and Defense Center. (And between you and me, Check Point would do well to sell the Sourcefire appliances instead of their own starting immediately - InterSpect is a lousy engine, and most people know it.) Just my $0.02, but this is much ado about very little. PaulM ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Sam Evans (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Wally Bedford (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort SN ORT (Oct 10)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Dirk Geschke (Oct 10)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Bob Walder (Oct 10)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Paul Melson (Oct 10)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort SN ORT (Oct 10)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Theodore Stout (Oct 11)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Matt Jonkman (Oct 17)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)