Re: Question on 663 - solved

[Nigel Houghton <nhoughton () sourcefire com>]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jack Pepper
<pepperjack () afferentsecurity com> wrote:
> ok, so i will rudely answer my own post, but only so that the thread
> ends with a resolution, rather than ending with "we all lost interest".
>
> Here is the description from arachnids:

<snip>

For the record, this description was not from Arachnids. This is the
text doc that relates to the rule and is in the rules tarball, it can
also be accessed here:

 http://www.snort.org/pub-bin/sigs.cgi?sid=663

-- 
Nigel Houghton
Head Mentalist
SF VRT
http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com && http://www.snort.org/vrt/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users