Snort mailing list archives
Re: Matching PCRE
From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists () tx rr com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:01:59 -0600
I suspected as much, so I added "G" after the match boundaries. We'll see if that totally breaks the rule. Hope not. :-) --On Tuesday, January 19, 2010 15:13:46 -0600 Matt Olney <molney () sourcefire com> wrote:
I think greediness may be biting you in the butt... So this would match: re> /(\w+).?=.?\1/ <----rough rewrite of your pcre data> applee=eapple 0: applee=eapple 1: apple data> sap=bsa 0: sap=bsa 1: sa data> buffalo=uffalo 0: uffalo=uffalo 1: uffalo data> buff=abuf 0: buff=abuf 1: buf
-- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
Current thread:
- Matching PCRE Paul Schmehl (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Guise McAllaster (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Guise McAllaster (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Matt Olney (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Paul Schmehl (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Paul Schmehl (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Joel Esler (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Matt Olney (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Paul Schmehl (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Guise McAllaster (Jan 19)
- Re: Matching PCRE Guise McAllaster (Jan 19)