Re: Sourcefire VRT Certified Snort Rules Update2010-03-17

["evilghost () packetmail net" <evilghost () packetmail net>]

Will Metcalf wrote:
> First off I know my opinion probably doesn't count for much, but I'm
> growing very tired of the anti-SF comments that tend to follow my
> posts, it doesn't add anything to the conversation and is quite
> annoying.  

Conversely, I grow very tired of the pro-Sourcefire comments, especially 
when legitimate concerns and issues are readily dismissed because it 
might just cause someone's fragile ego to crack.  I grow tired of the 
necessity to approach glaring issues, miscommunication, and other 
nonsense with humility and subservience because evidently it's now 
protocol.  I don't have the will for tact anymore when dealing with 
Sourcefire.
> Agree with their decisions or not, things
> would be more pleasant if you would at least show some respect for a
> company that has invested millions of dollars into something that you
> are now using in your network and/or have built a business around that
> you have payed absolutely nothing for.
>   
Hmm.  I thought this was an Open-Source product/solution?  I do pay, a 
fair amount of money for a VRT subscription, which as of late I'm very 
much questioning it's value, but that's another post for another time in 
the future.

-evilghost

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs