Snort mailing list archives
Re: msg update for these, please?
From: "Jefferson, Shawn" <Shawn.Jefferson () bcferries com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:13:12 -0600
Would this rule trigger for a 16-bit DOS MZ executable being requested as well? The PE in the alert description could be misleading maybe. It looks like the rule only looks for ".exe" in the http_uri, and doesn't generate any alert by itself (just sets a flowbit that is checked by other rules). Actually it looks like 15306 checks for both MZ and PE executables anyway... not that big of a deal I guess, everyone knows what it means when you see this alert. ________________________________ From: Alex Kirk [mailto:akirk () sourcefire com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:55 PM To: Jefferson, Shawn Cc: wkitty42 () windstream net; snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] msg update for these, please? Well-put, Shawn. I just updated 16425 (for the next SEU, anyway) to read "WEB-CLIENT request for Portable Executable binary file", that should do the trick. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Jefferson, Shawn <Shawn.Jefferson () bcferries com<mailto:Shawn.Jefferson () bcferries com>> wrote: Maybe something along the lines of: WEB-CLIENT Request for exe file and WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer which would explain what's happening a little better, and avoid potential confusion hopefully. ________________________________ From: Alex Kirk [mailto:akirk () sourcefire com<mailto:akirk () sourcefire com>] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:00 AM To: wkitty42 () windstream net<mailto:wkitty42 () windstream net> Cc: snort-users () lists sourceforge net<mailto:snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Subject: Re: [Snort-users] msg update for these, please? Actually, they both look for PE files headed towards a client - the first looks for the PE signature itself coming down, the second for a request for a .exe. Duplicate messages are generally no fun, though, so how about making the second one "WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer - .exe in URI"? On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:48 PM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net<mailto:wkitty42 () windstream net>> wrote: can we get a MSG update for these, please?? OLD: 15306 WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer 16425 WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer NEW: 15306 WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer to client 16425 WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer to server or some such? thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net<mailto:Snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users -- Alex Kirk AEGIS Program Lead Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team +1-410-423-1937 alex.kirk () sourcefire com<mailto:alex.kirk () sourcefire com> -- Alex Kirk AEGIS Program Lead Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team +1-410-423-1937 alex.kirk () sourcefire com<mailto:alex.kirk () sourcefire com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: msg update for these, please?, (continued)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Jefferson, Shawn (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)