Snort mailing list archives

Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody?


From: Jason Brvenik <jason () sourcefire com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:54:31 -0400

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Matthew Jonkman
<jonkman () emergingthreatspro com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Jason Brvenik wrote:

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Matthew Jonkman
<jonkman () emergingthreatspro com> wrote:
You make a good point, but I fear that'd be more confusing.
If the sids aren't the same then folks will assume they're different rules,
and run them all.
The average new snort/suricata user gets rule crazy (I remember doing it :)
) and just downloading and enabling everything they can find. I think we'd
end up wasting a lot of cpu cycles....
But I'm flexible. We're a community. Lets decide together. I've voted for
keeping them the same, because we don't have a need to run them at the same
time, and they're GPL so it's free use.

Define "them" please

Is your assertion that users don't need to run VRT and ET Rules sets?


Them here = the GPL rules sid 3164 and under. I'm making the point that no one would need to run both the ET version 
of the gpl rules and the VRT version of them, so sid duplication is a moot point.

In fact, we'll cause issues IF we put them in different sid ranges because folks will assume they need to run both 
then...

Instead we have a situation where old rules are deprecated,
superseded, colliding, etc. I think that in general folks assume they
need both already, enlightenment comes later. Causing new users pain
for what amounts to an ideological position. I don't believe
duplicating them in any form is appropriate unless there is a
divergence in what they do and detect thus creating a new rule.

Ultimately I posit that duplication of inspection content and not SID
isn't going to change things greatly compared to the use of 10K+ rules
already deployed from both sets and the clear pain it presents to new
and longs standing users.


Matt


Thoughts?
Matt
On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Weir, Jason wrote:

Seems to me it might be time for ET to re-name and re-sid those rules.

Then VRT and ET can go in whatever direction they deem appropriate.  Without
confusing the user base.

Yes it means more rule overlap but that's something us end users are dealing
with already..

-J


----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Jonkman <jonkman () emergingthreatspro com>
To: Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>
Cc: Weir, Jason; Emerging Threats Threats Signatures
<emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net>; waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net>;
snort-users () lists sourceforge net <snort-users () lists sourceforge net>
Sent: Fri Mar 18 16:40:41 2011
Subject: Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?  Nobody?

The issue is though that VRT won't support versions back to snort 2.4, nor a
version for suricata, which we do at ET. So we have the gpl rules here as
well in the ET ruleset.

If that could be worked out we could integrate, but I think SF has made it
clear their stance on suricata, and on snorts more than 2 versions back.

Matt


On Mar 18, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Joel Esler wrote:

That was a porn rule.  Which we've gotten rid of.

Rules that are <1,000,000 in SID are officially maintained by the VRT
(even the sids that were available before the VRT license change -- commonly
referred to as "gpl rules").

Emerging threats is encouraged to submit any changes to the ruleset to
sids <1,000,000 back to the VRT for inclusion into the VRT set.  However,
the numbers should not be duplicated.

J

On Mar 18, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Weir, Jason wrote:

That is the raw packet data - as outputted by BASE anyways..

That rule is in the ET set here

http://rules.emergingthreats.net/open/snort-2.9.0/emerging-all.rules

-J

-----Original Message-----
From: waldo kitty [mailto:wkitty42 () windstream net]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 2:53 PM
To: Weir, Jason
Cc: emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
Subject: Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody?


On 3/18/2011 13:56, Weir, Jason wrote:
After I spammed the snort sigs list on this - looks like it
came with
the ET rules..

It's probably not maintained by anyone but I'm seeing what
could be a FP
on 1313

sid:1313; does not exist in my setup with both VRT and ET
rules sets... not even
as a commented line...

Here's the data - no "up skirt" that I can see....

is that the raw packet data?



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Please visit www.nhrs.org to subscribe to NHRS email announcements and
updates.
_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!

--
Joel Esler
jesler () sourcefire.com
http://blog.snort.org && http://blog.clamav.net
Twitter: @snort

_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!


----------------------------------------------------
Matthew Jonkman
Emergingthreats.net
Emerging Threats Pro
Open Information Security Foundation (OISF)
Phone 765-807-8630 x110
Fax 312-264-0205
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
http://www.openinfosecfoundation.org
----------------------------------------------------

PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc





_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Please visit www.nhrs.org to subscribe to NHRS email announcements and
updates.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Please visit www.nhrs.org to subscribe to NHRS email announcements and
updates.

_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!

----------------------------------------------------
Matthew Jonkman
Emergingthreats.net
Emerging Threats Pro
Open Information Security Foundation (OISF)
Phone 765-807-8630 x110
Fax 312-264-0205
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
http://www.openinfosecfoundation.org
----------------------------------------------------

PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc




_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!



----------------------------------------------------
Matthew Jonkman
Emergingthreats.net
Emerging Threats Pro
Open Information Security Foundation (OISF)
Phone 765-807-8630 x110
Fax 312-264-0205
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
http://www.openinfosecfoundation.org
----------------------------------------------------

PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: