Snort mailing list archives

reject is identical to drop


From: HN Nguyen <nhncontact () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:24:53 -0700

I'm using snort (v2.9.0.5) inline with iptables. I have a rule with "reject"
action, but when it triggers, no packet is sent back to the sender (tcpdump
on all interfaces confirm this).

The rule is:
reject tcp any any -> any 7

The log shows:
07/07-00:15:19.553113  [Drop][Priority: 0] {TCP} 192.168.41.122:38805 ->
192.168.1.57:7

This is identical to the behaviour when I change the action to "drop".

Is there anything I'm missing or doing wrong?

Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

Please see http://www.snort.org/docs for documentation

Current thread: