Re: Enormous increase in GZIP Decompression failures with 2.9.3 vs 2.9.2.3 on 64-bit

[Brett Edgar <brett.edgar () gmail com>]

Update: the *exact* ./configure command was:

./configure --prefix=/usr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc
--localstatedir=/var/lib --libdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-shared
--disable-static --enable-sourcefire --disable-so-with-static-lib
--enable-dynamicplugin --disable-control-socket --enable-ipv6
--enable-zlib --enable-gre --enable-mpls --enable-targetbased
--enable-ppm --enable-perfprofiling --enable-linux-smp-stats
--disable-inline-init-failopen --enable-pthread --disable-debug
--disable-debug-msgs --disable-corefiles --disable-gdb
--enable-dlclose --enable-active-response --enable-normalizer
--enable-reload --enable-reload-error-restart --enable-react
--enable-flexresp3 --enable-paf --disable-large-pcap
--disable-rzb-saac --disable-build-dynamic-examples --disable-profile
--disable-ppm-test --disable-intel-soft-cpm --disable-static-daq
--disable-rzb-saac

Gentoo ebuilds make ./configure a little wordy. :)  FYI, this is my
own ebuild, not an official Gentoo one, not that that should matter.

GCC version is 4.5.3.

Also, I am a C programmer and I have done my homework: I have examined
the code changes for http_inspect between 2.9.2.3 and 2.9.3, and
nothing jumps out at me as being problematic...

-Brett

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Brett Edgar <brett.edgar () gmail com> wrote:
> After upgrading a handful of x64 IDS sensors from Snort 2.9.2.3 to
> Snort 2.9.3.0, I have noticed an enormous increase (almost 45 times
> higher) in GZIP decompression failures (sig 120:6) coming from the
> http_inspect preprocessor.  The only other package that was updated
> with the move to Snort 2.9.3 was the Sourcefire DAQ library (from
> 0.6.2 to 1.1.1).
>
> Since the VRT did not recommend any snort.conf changes, my Snort
> configuration was not changed aside from moving to the 2.9.3.0
> subscription rule set (from 2.9.2.3).  The http_inspect configuration
> is identical to what I was using with 2.9.2.3.
>
> What's bothersome is that I do NOT see the same increase on some x86
> (32-bit) sensors that were upgraded at the same time.
>
> I'm using Gentoo as my distro.  My x86 and x64 versions are compiled
> identically and linked against the same packages.  Snort was compiled
> with --enable-sourcefire --linux-smp-stats and
> --enable-reload-error-restart.  It is linked with zlib 1.2.5, libpcap
> 1.1.1, libdnet 1.11, daq 1.1.1, and libpcre 8.30.
>
> Since I've only seen the 120:6 alert increase on 64-bit systems, I'm
> thinking there was some code change that may be using the wrong size
> integers?
>
> -Brett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Snort-devel mailing list
Snort-devel () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel

Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!