Snort mailing list archives
Re: Rule thoughts
From: James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:22:56 -0600
On 2012-09-06 13:14, Joel Esler wrote:
Think in the reverse order. content:"mailto:<"; content:!">"; distance:0; within:1500; Although you if you have a mailto that is longer than say... 100, that's probably bad. On Sep 6, 2012, at 3:08 PM, James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net> wrote:Hey all, So...been keeping my eye on: http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2012/Sep/29 and was interested in this portion to have Snort look at: @font-face { font-family: "MyFont"; src: url(mailto:xxx<... approximately 2,020 characters removed ...>xxx); } My thought was to do something like: content: "mailto:<"; content: ">"; within: 1500; or would offset be more appropriate? Any pointers would help...thank you. James
Thanks for fixing my thinking Joel :) Guess maybe a more generic rule would work as well..."Unusually long mailto detected" or something. I'll see what I can come up with. James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs http://www.snort.org Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!
Current thread:
- Rule thoughts James Lay (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts Joel Esler (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts James Lay (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts waldo kitty (Sep 07)
- Re: Rule thoughts lists () packetmail net (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts James Lay (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts rmkml (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts James Lay (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts James Lay (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts Joel Esler (Sep 06)
- Re: Rule thoughts James Lay (Sep 06)