Snort mailing list archives

Re: Question about Content-Disposition, Content-Type, etc. and http_header buffer


From: Mike Cox <mike.cox52 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:45:47 -0500

Hey Joel, thanks for the quick response.  Right now I don't have a pcap ...
the info I got was reproduced from what I saw on a screen while helping our
guys/gals track down an issue/RCA in the "Temptest" (SOC) room and I can't
get any data out of there and if I could, it would be breaking many laws
(well, internal "laws" but there could be international intel impact and
NDA lawsuits if you know what I mean :)

However, I think that the information provided is sufficient to illustrate
this issue and it should be trivial for VRT to create necessary pcaps for
their testing, if that is what you want.

I can cook up a pcap but as earlier implied, I don't think it is is
necessary for me to provide this at this point and I certainly do not want
to insult VRT by spoon-feeding them data that they can easily and more
completely create on their own with minimal effort.

I believe that I have outlined the issue and provided the necessary data to
accurately describe the problem.  Even without a pcap, I think the info
provided is sufficient for a good discussion.  Has anyone else experienced
this challenge with their snort installs?  If so, how do you deal with this
nuance of HTTP and the current state of http-inspect?

Please let me know if you are unclear on anything or need more information
regarding this issue.

Thanks all.

-Mike Cox



On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com> wrote:

Can you send me a pcap?

--
Joel Esler
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager
Sourcefire

On Oct 16, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Mike Cox <mike.cox52 () gmail com> wrote:

I've noticed that in some multipart/form-data POSTs, data that is normally
in the HTTP header gets sent in the body of the message and not parsed by
http-inspect as part of the http_header buffer.  Specifically, the headers
"Content-Type", "Content-Disposition", and "Content-Transfer-Encoding",
although there could be others.  For example:

POST /blackhole/safe.php HTTP/1.1
Host: snort.org
Content-Type: multipart/form-data, boundary=---dG91Y2hteXNub3J0
Content-Length: 8675309

---dG91Y2hteXNub3J0
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="name"

Joshua
---dG91Y2hteXNub3J0
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="play_a_game"

True
---dG91Y2hteXNub3J0
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file";
filename="GLOBAL_THERMONUCLEAR_WAR.pdf"
Content-Type: application/pdf
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
...

So a snort rule looking for a specific filename in a Content-Disposition
header wouldn't match if it were written as you would expect it to be
written.  For example, this wouldn't match the above:

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Bad PDF File
Upload"; flow:established,to_server; content:"Content-Disposition";
http_header; content:"filename="; distance:0; http_header; content:".pdf";
distance:0; within:100; http_header; sid:1234567;)

What is the best way to match this and not incur the overhead of using
global content matches?  Is there a plan for the http-inspect pre-processor
to account for this?

Thanks.

-Mike Cox

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:

http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!

Current thread: