Snort mailing list archives
Re: Comment Request
From: waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:02:40 -0500
On 11/10/2012 02:43, HamidReza Ghorbani wrote:
The goals is to address shortcomings of Signature based IDS(like SNORT) with one of the approaches above. It is important that the selected approach is compatible with SNORT, when implementing.
ummm... i believe that if you dig deeper into those projects you mentioned, you'll find that they use snort internally... suricata doesn't as it is a different engine but it, too, is rules based... how else would you expect them to work and be customizable as to what they detect on your network?? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- Comment Request HamidReza Ghorbani (Nov 13)
- Re: Comment Request waldo kitty (Nov 13)
- Re: Comment Request Jeremy Hoel (Nov 13)
- Re: Comment Request Castle, Shane (Nov 13)
- Re: Comment Request Jeremy Hoel (Nov 13)
- Re: Comment Request livio Ricciulli (Nov 13)
- Re: Comment Request waldo kitty (Nov 13)