Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports?
From: Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:07:33 -0400
On Apr 23, 2013, at 3:56 PM, "Castle, Shane" <scastle () bouldercounty org> wrote:
Maybe this should be left to classic firewall rules rather than IDS? But it'd be nice to have defense in depth.
This is what I'm thinking. But we have a feature we're looking at that may solve this in Snort. Don't want to commit to it yet as bad things happen when I say "new feature may be coming" and then I get in trouble when the release slips.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs http://www.snort.org Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!
Current thread:
- TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Castle, Shane (Apr 23)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Will Metcalf (Apr 23)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Castle, Shane (Apr 23)
- Message not available
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Castle, Shane (Apr 23)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Joel Esler (Apr 23)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Castle, Shane (Apr 23)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] TCP/UDP "trivial" ports? Will Metcalf (Apr 23)