Snort mailing list archives
'ignore_call_channel' setting seems to have no effect
From: Emre Gundogan <emre () gundogan us>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:53:58 -0400
Hi. I am running Snort (V2.9.4.6) on a firewall + IP-PBX. Is it normal that, on a typically idle machine, Snort takes up roughly 7-10% of CPU for each concurrent media session? The SIP preprocessor is enabled and 'ignore_call_channel' is set in the configuration. With this setting, I expected snort to ignore RTP traffic in a SIP session. But based on my limited experience so far, that's not happening, as the CPU stays constant around 10% (all used by snort process) for the entire session. Add a second call, and the CPU goes to 20% (snort process). Am I doing something wrong here? Thanks a lot. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- 'ignore_call_channel' setting seems to have no effect Emre Gundogan (Jul 25)
- Re: 'ignore_call_channel' setting seems to have no effect Hui Cao (Jul 26)
- Re: 'ignore_call_channel' setting seems to have no effect Emre Gundogan (Jul 26)
- Re: 'ignore_call_channel' setting seems to have no effect Hui Cao (Jul 26)