Snort mailing list archives
Re: 2955 sigs for registered users
From: <wkitty42 () windstream net>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 20:53:34 -0400
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 9:37 PM, Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 9:14 PM, <wkitty42 () windstream net> wrote:We are using the dynamic detection rules, so reverting to 2953 isn't anoption.you can compile 2953's so rules for 2955 with possibly a slight modificationor two to the makefile... it isn't that hard to do... IIRC, the main one was related to the engine version... The open ones, yes. But things like our truffle rules: http://vrt-blog.snort.org/2013/10/ie-zero-day-cve-2013-3897-youve-been.html We ship those precompiled.
those would be shipped to paying clients, then... right? just registered folks wouldn't even know about them, right? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- 2955 sigs for registered users Turnbough, Bradley E. (Oct 09)
- Re: 2955 sigs for registered users Joel Esler (Oct 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 2955 sigs for registered users wkitty42 (Oct 09)
- Re: 2955 sigs for registered users Joel Esler (Oct 09)
- Re: 2955 sigs for registered users wkitty42 (Oct 10)
- Re: 2955 sigs for registered users Joel Esler (Oct 11)